Nintendo Fan Forum  

Go Back   Nintendo Fan Forum > General Forum > General Chat > WorldWide News, Politics & Religion

Notices

WorldWide News, Politics & Religion Title Says It All

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-07-2011, 04:22 PM   #1
SirManguydude
LoZ Expert
Points: 11,143, Level: 69
Points: 11,143, Level: 69 Points: 11,143, Level: 69 Points: 11,143, Level: 69
User owns 1x Gold Coin User owns 1x Rupee Bag User owns 1x Earth Element User owns 1x Mirror Shield User owns 1x Gold Cucoo User owns 1x Fire Element User owns 1x Master Sword
User owns 1x Heart Tank User owns 1x Z-Saber User owns 1x X-Buster User owns 1x Sub Tank User owns 1x Zero\'s Helmet User owns 1x Megaman\'s Helmet User owns 1x Black Belt
 
SirManguydude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
Posts: 2,971

My Mood: Lonely
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 127
SirManguydude has a reputation beyond reputeSirManguydude has a reputation beyond reputeSirManguydude has a reputation beyond reputeSirManguydude has a reputation beyond reputeSirManguydude has a reputation beyond reputeSirManguydude has a reputation beyond reputeSirManguydude has a reputation beyond reputeSirManguydude has a reputation beyond reputeSirManguydude has a reputation beyond reputeSirManguydude has a reputation beyond reputeSirManguydude has a reputation beyond repute

Friend Codes

Awards Showcase
NFF Old Man Award NFF 3rd Annual Award Royalty Super Member Good Grammar Award Yoshi Signature of the Month Banner of the Month 
Total Awards: 12

Bill in Senate to induce Military Law?

Quote:
Do you see a problem with a law that authorizes indefinite military detention of anyone the president identifies as an enemy of the state? For President Barack Obama, the problem is clear: The law does not give him enough discretion.
Obama has threatened to veto the National Defense Authorization Act if the final version includes a provision approved by the Senate last week that requires military detention of some terrorism suspects. Obama, like his predecessor, wants the leeway to keep them in civilian custody, and maybe even give them a trial, if he so chooses. Those of us who are not the president are apt to be more concerned about the unchecked power the bill gives him to lock us up and throw away the key.
Defenders of the bill’s detention provisions say they merely codify powers granted by the Authorization for Use of Military Force that Congress approved after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. But unlike the AUMF, Section 1031 of the National Defense Authorization Act explicitly “affirms” the legality of military detention “without trial.” Furthermore, it says such treatment is permitted not only for “a person who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks” or who “harbored those responsible” but also for anyone who joins or supports al-Qaida, the Taliban, or “associated forces” — a much wider net. Section 1032 of the bill creates a presumption in favor of military detention for a member of al-Qaida or an allied organization who “participated in the course of planning or carrying out an attack or attempted attack against the United States or its coalition partners.” But it says “the requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.”
Taken together, these two sections mean military detention is authorized but not required for U.S. citizens. As Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a leading supporter of the bill, put it on the Senate floor last month, “1032, the military custody provision . . . doesn’t apply to American citizens. 1031, the statement of authority to detain, does apply to American citizens, and it designates the world as the battlefield, including the homeland.”
In short, the bill asserts the president’s power to snatch anyone from anywhere, including a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil, and confine him in a military prison without charge until the end of a perpetual, worldwide war against an amorphous enemy. Senators from both parties who were alarmed at that prospect tried to remove the detention provisions, but the most they could achieve was an amendment saying the bill does not “limit or expand” the president’s powers under the AUMF or “affect existing law or authorities” regarding detention of people “captured or arrested in the United States.”
According to its sponsor, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the amendment “leaves it to the courts to decide.”
In 2004 the Supreme Court said due process required that a U.S. citizen captured on the battlefield in Afghanistan and held as an enemy combatant be given “a meaningful opportunity to contest the factual basis for that detention before a neutral decisionmaker.” The Bush administration let him go instead. In the two cases where the Pentagon took charge of terrorism suspects arrested in the United States, the government likewise avoided a definitive judicial resolution, transferring them back to civilian custody before the Supreme Court had a chance to rule on their treatment.
In any case, the Feinstein amendment represents an astonishing abdication of legislative responsibility. The courts should be deciding the constitutionality of the detention policy established by Congress, not sifting through deliberately ambiguous statutory language to figure out what that policy is.

Chicago Sun-Times




Wired also ran a similar article here.


Thoughts, comments, questions, concerns?
__________________


A slipping gear could let your M203 grenade launcher fire when you least expect it. That would make you quite unpopular in what's left of your unit.

SirManguydude is offline  
Sponsored Links
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Suicide: Against Religion, and the Law Rai17 Debate Forum 112 11-22-2012 11:35 AM
Protect IP Bill Tanis General Chat 4 10-28-2011 08:29 AM
Triforce on the One Dollar Bill WolfbladeTakashi Zelda Series 11 10-10-2011 11:33 AM
Sturgeons Law SegaSlayer33 Debate Forum 8 08-30-2009 05:27 AM
Law & Order Anubis Introductions! 10 12-20-2008 06:26 PM

NFF Youtube Videos NFF Facebook page

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Nintendo Blog

Nintendofanforum.com is a Nintendo fansite and is not associated with or endorsed by Nintendo of America, Inc.
All trademarks and images belong to their respective owners.
Nintendo Wii